Free 10 Day Trial

Sign Up Today
Signal of the Week · Week of November 9, 2026
MRVL
NASDAQ · Marvell Technology

Half the price in five weeks. I think the selloff went too far, and I want defined risk on the way back.

Nov 6 Close
$141.20
Friday Bounce
+5.7%
Early Oct High
~$287
Implied Vol
~80%

Marvell closed near $287 in early October. On Friday it closed at $141.20. Most of that damage came in a few sessions: the all-stock Lumentum deal on November 2 came on a 12.7 percent down day, and Thursday’s chip selloff took it to a $133.55 close.

Friday it bounced. My view is simple: I think MRVL works back into the $150s to $160s by the end of 2026. I’m not trying to call the exact bottom. I’m trying to put on a position where I know my worst case before I click buy.

Why a spread, not plain calls

With implied volatility near 80 percent, calls are expensive. The December 150 call alone cost about $12.10 at Friday’s mid, which means the stock needs to get to roughly $162 by December 18 just to break even. That doesn’t fit a $150 to $160 view.

So I’m buying the Dec 18 145 call and selling the Dec 18 160 call. Selling the 160 pays for much of the 145, and since my target is 160, I don’t need upside past it.

~$5.70
Net debit (max loss)
145C mid ~$14.28 minus 160C mid ~$8.60
~$150.70
Breakeven at expiry
145 strike plus the debit
~$9.30
Max profit (+163%)
with MRVL at or above $160 on Dec 18

The runway, four stops

  • Stop · $133.55
    The line in the sand
    A daily close below Thursday’s $133.55 close means the low didn’t hold. I close the spread rather than wait.
  • Entry · ~$141
    Where I start
    Around Friday’s $141.20 close, after the first bounce off the low.
  • Breakeven · ~$150.70
    Paid for
    About 6.7 percent above Friday’s close. Above here at expiration, the trade makes money.
  • Target · $160
    Full value
    At $160 or higher on December 18, the spread is worth its full $15 width.
The levels that matter
Target / short strike$160.00
Breakeven at expiry~$150.70
Long strike$145.00
Entry area (Nov 6 close)$141.20
Stop: close below$133.55

What can break this trade

The case for
  • A roughly 50 percent drop in about five weeks is an extreme move for a large chip name. Some of that is forced selling, not a change in the business.
  • Friday’s bounce came straight off Thursday’s low, which gives the trade a clear level to lean on.
  • The spread caps my cost at the debit and needs only a move back to the $150s, not a full recovery.
The case against
  • The Lumentum deal is all stock, and the market may keep pricing in dilution and integration risk for a while.
  • Chips are where the selling has been heaviest. If the sector leg down continues, MRVL can go with it no matter the setup.
  • Time works against me. If MRVL just drifts sideways into December 18, the spread loses value even without a breakdown.
The plan is simple. I know my max loss going in, and a close below $133.55 means I’m out.

How I’ll manage it

Members get the management plan as it happens: when I’d take profits early, whether to roll if MRVL stalls near the breakeven, and the alert the moment the stop triggers.

Early profit rule
[ MEMBERS ONLY ]
Roll plan
[ MEMBERS ONLY ]
Position sizing
[ MEMBERS ONLY ]
Live exit alert
[ MEMBERS ONLY ]
Every MTOptions alert carries a defined entry, a defined exit and a protective stop. Use code 30 at signup to extend your free trial from 10 days to 30.

Stock prices are daily closes from Yahoo Finance as of the November 6, 2026 close. Option prices are bid/ask midpoints for the December 18, 2026 expiration at that close (145 call 14.00/14.55, 160 call 8.45/8.75) and will change. Breakeven and profit figures are at expiration, per share, before commissions. One spread controls 100 shares.

Not financial advice. MTOptions is a publication of Pinpoint Financial Group LLC. Content is provided for educational and informational purposes only and is not individualized investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Options carry substantial risk and are not suitable for every investor. Past performance does not guarantee future results.